[FOR HIRE] Commissions Open! Fanarts, Original Characters, real people in One Piece-like style!

2022.01.17 18:57 anabarana [FOR HIRE] Commissions Open! Fanarts, Original Characters, real people in One Piece-like style!

[FOR HIRE] Commissions Open! Fanarts, Original Characters, real people in One Piece-like style! submitted by anabarana to HungryArtists [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 KieselguhrKid13 I'm so sick of the Carolina Squat. (Pardon the windshield glare - bad lighting.)

I'm so sick of the Carolina Squat. (Pardon the windshield glare - bad lighting.) submitted by KieselguhrKid13 to Shitty_Car_Mods [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 No-Newspaper-7850 Kobe Bryant, China, 2015

Kobe Bryant, China, 2015 submitted by No-Newspaper-7850 to pics [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 Tommy64xx Who's skiing?! Let's chat!

32 m uk
submitted by Tommy64xx to cocaine [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 Sithra907 Jon Snow's ruse to save a defeated king's heir from the new Baratheon king mirrors Eddard's decision to save Jon as a baby

Reading through comments on this thread, it just now hit me that Jon actually plays the same ruse that Eddard did with him when it comes to Mance Rayder's baby.
He ends up with the infant son of a defeated king, who the Baratheon king would surely execute. And just like his daddy (regardless of his birth father), he chose to use deception to save the baby's life by claiming it to be someone else's.
Not sure why I never noticed the symmetry there before. I can't help but imagine this will help him come to terms with it later when he finds out his whole life was a lie because of his 'father'. I imagine he'll understand and empathize with Eddard's decision much more after he's basically made the same decision.
Not exactly the most profound realization, but still something neat I haven't caught folk discussing on here previously.
submitted by Sithra907 to freefolk [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 TheHappyHawaiian I bought a year’s worth of cat food because of increasing shortages in pet food. They called to confirm the order. They aren’t ready for stockpiling habits to increase in the general population

I bought a year’s worth of cat food because of increasing shortages in pet food. They called to confirm the order. They aren’t ready for stockpiling habits to increase in the general population submitted by TheHappyHawaiian to Shortages [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 KaliPaytas according to the tunas, Being anti semetic= ok but DONT YOU DARE SAY MEXICAN FOOD MAKES YOU POOP! (Beans make you gassy it's a fact)

according to the tunas, Being anti semetic= ok but DONT YOU DARE SAY MEXICAN FOOD MAKES YOU POOP! (Beans make you gassy it's a fact) submitted by KaliPaytas to Trishyland [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 Opposite_Signature67 Be able to breed with any humanoid mob in the game

Evoker, Illusioner, Pillager, Villager, Vindicator, Wandering Trader, Witch, Zombie Villager
Breeding with a zombie villager will cure it if the player has the weakness effect and then shoves a golden apple into the zombie villager's ass/vagina.
submitted by Opposite_Signature67 to shittymcsuggestions [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 pinkwaferlover In what order would you open these?

In what order would you open these? submitted by pinkwaferlover to Scotch [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 Wizcallifuh Which bird starter should I choose?

Which bird starter should I choose? submitted by Wizcallifuh to pokemongo [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 ThoughtOriginal9860 Check out our winter Yosemite national park video!!

Check out our winter Yosemite national park video!! submitted by ThoughtOriginal9860 to vlog [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 jaeszn The Best of r/StrayKids Awards 2021 - Results Thread

Hello Stay! Thank you all for participating in our first Best of StrayKids Awards for 2021! We received many great nominations that highlighted the best posts, comments, and users.
Each winning post/comment/user will receive an exclusive "Best of StrayKids 2021 Award" that gives a month of Reddit Premium and will be immortalized in the StrayKids wiki.
We are still waiting on Reddit Admins to hand out the coins, awards will be given out as soon as we receive them.
Winners Best Fan Content Post

Best Discussion Post
Best Theory Post
Best Misc. Post
Most Helpful Comment
Funniest Comment
Winners of the next following categories, please leave a comment in this thread to receive your award!
Most Notable Stay
Best User Flair
Closing Remarks Congratulations to all the winners and a big shout out to all the nominees! The moderator team would like to thank you all for your contributions and effort to StrayKids in 2021.
See you next year for The Best of StrayKids Awards 2022!
submitted by jaeszn to straykids [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 Soul_Bound_28 Kudos bot strikes.

Went from 120 to over 200 in minutes and an additional when I refreshed.
submitted by Soul_Bound_28 to FanFiction [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 stinkerwren 👑 Shiba Fuji💎 | 10% $SHIB rewards 💰 | Stealth launched at 10k market cap and already on it's way to MOON | Experienced Team 🔥 | Anti Whale 🐳 | $ShibaFuji

Are you tired of rugpulls, scams, and honeypots? Today we present you to $ShibaFuji!

Contract - 0x612c920A581Ab0771869e8747ed97449a46FdAaB
Telegram: https://t.me/Shiba_Fuji

What is ShibaFuji?

ShibaFuji Just Launched and is a $SHIB reward token that treats you with 10% distribution per transaction and gives you SHIBA-tokens directly into your wallet! Also it adds to the liquidity with 3% to ensure static growth of the project.
The token will have tons of upcoming marketing and giveaways so your investment will increase! The yield generating mechanism will help provide enough liquidity to buy bigger amounts in the future and also increases the token value and helps us build the project further.

Tokenomics: 10,000,000,000 Total supply

5% max wallet to ensure no whales
Tax 0% for buy 18% for sell:
10% in SHIBA reward
3% to locked liquidity pool
5% to marketing and buyback
Slippage is ~18.5% (18% + 0,5% Pancake)

Links and Social Media:

💰Contract - 0x612c920A581Ab0771869e8747ed97449a46FdAaB
💰Telegram: https://t.me/Shiba_Fuji
💰Liquidity Lock: https://www.pinksale.finance/#/pinklock/record/14648?chain=BSC
💰PancakeSwap V2: https://pancakeswap.finance/swap?outputCurrency=0x612c920A581Ab0771869e8747ed97449a46FdAaB
submitted by stinkerwren to CryptoMarsShots [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 operator139 I'm headed out, I'll see you there, maybe not, either way, it's worth the shot.

Perhaps the stars will make us align again one day.
submitted by operator139 to operator139 [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 nolan72921 .

. submitted by nolan72921 to facepalm [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 Reasonable_Cap7912 Itto + Zhongli + Bennett + Yun Jin

Itto + Zhongli + Bennett + Yun Jin submitted by Reasonable_Cap7912 to IttoMains [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 ASICmachine BTC can be anonymous, if you use L2 like Lightning anyone can see your address and no give a sh*t (x-post from /r/Bitcoin)

BTC can be anonymous, if you use L2 like Lightning anyone can see your address and no give a sh*t (x-post from /Bitcoin) submitted by ASICmachine to CryptoCurrencyClassic [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 Head-Picture-451 Anglo=Bad Latino=Good

Anglo=Bad Latino=Good submitted by Head-Picture-451 to TheLeftCantMeme [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 Kingofthekaiju1954 What's your favorite SpongeBob SquarePants Episode, and what's your favorite quote from said episode?

submitted by Kingofthekaiju1954 to AskReddit [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 jlyfshhh Just set up Plex Meta Manager...where are the posters?

So as of now I just had it make genre collections to start off with since I just set it up for the first time. I thought that it would also add custom posters to the collections it makes too. Is that not the case or do I just have something set up wrong?
submitted by jlyfshhh to PlexPosters [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 IEnjoyWritingNotes Under a month old realm recruiting 13+ (Windows, console and switch welcome)

Under a month old realm recruiting 13+ (Windows, console and switch welcome) submitted by IEnjoyWritingNotes to mcrealmsservers [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 kamombaer Are there any MP statistics?

I wondered if there were any stats on MP. Maybe some of you can tell me. Whats a good income at like 15 hundred? And 16 hundred? Etc. What is good dev at that point what is the minimum? What army size should I have at those points? What Manpower? Just want to know how I am doing and whats like average to good stats.
submitted by kamombaer to eu4 [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 TGS_Polar Is TikTok overhated?

A lot of people hate it without ever even using it. It has great content once the algorithm knows what you like. The cringe videos are only like 10% of what TikTok has to offer.
View Poll
submitted by TGS_Polar to polls [link] [comments]


2022.01.17 18:57 StonkGodCapital $ESSC - Updated & Fully Detailed Due Diligence/Signal - Imminent Gamma Squeeze

$ESSC - Updated & Fully Detailed Due Diligence/Signal - Imminent Gamma Squeeze
Heading into this week, we are anticipating the ESSC play to gain a significantly greater amount of attention. Because of this, we're releasing this updated and expanded signal fully outlining the research behind the play.
Overview The Setup This play is classified as a low-float gamma squeeze. This means that the stock has an unusually small amount of free trading shares and further it has less than the usually required amount of shares to have options. In this case of ESSC, the stock has 1.1M shares trading and the ITM OI accounts for 332% of those shares. There is also evidence that the float is actively shrinking to 340K shares (again) making this play not only even more unique, but potentially even more explosive.
This signal will lay out the specifics of the setup, including how we arrived at our calculation of the float and our analysis of the OI and the plays potential.
What is a Gamma Squeeze? A gamma squeeze is a type of squeeze caused by delta hedging from options market makers. When a high amount of in-the-money (ITM) call options are sold on a stock, options market makers will "hedge" (acquire shares at market) to offset their risk. Normally this process is uneventful, however, should a stock acquire enough OI in comparison to it's free-trading float, the act of hedging can create substantial buying pressure and a cascading affect that leads to a dramatic increase in the price of the underlying. Common examples of gamma squeezes are GME in January 2021, AMC in June 2021, SPRT in August 2021 and IRNT in September 2021.
The Company ESSC is a pre-merger SPAC. This means that they've found a target for their merger and are in the process of completing it. Somewhat unusually they overshot the amount of time they had to fulfill their purpose and merge with a company, so in November, they requested an extension from their shareholders which was approved and their deadline was moved to mid-February 2022.
Outstanding Public Shares Before we work down to our float count, we need to establish how many redeemable (free trading) shares there are. To this we look to the SEC filings which state there are 13,800,000 shares that are freely publicly trading:

https://preview.redd.it/psbn8ufgkbc81.png?width=2100&format=png&auto=webp&s=67c9ce65121b3ef9e17390fdb93d6b5b1dff0270
Excerpt from: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgadata/0001760683/000121390021059515/f10q0921_eaststoneacq.htm
The Redemptions During the extension meeting, shareholders of ESSC opted to exercise their right to redeem a substantial amount of the company's shares. When shares are redeemed in a SPAC, shareholders essentially "give back" their shares and their value is returned to them from the company's trust. The shares that are redeemed are cancelled and no longer exist. This means that the number of outstanding shares, and thus the float, is lessened by the amount of shares redeemed.
In the case of ESSC, shareholders redeemed 10,534,895 of it's 13,800,000 outstanding shares leaving 3,265,105 shares outstanding:

https://preview.redd.it/ual8da6ikbc81.png?width=1922&format=png&auto=webp&s=d011fc0463d7565c645b23471657dc120f80fcd8
Excerpt from: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgadata/0001760683/000121390021062187/ea151419-8k_eaststone.htm
Backstop Investors Now there is a final part of this that has required extensive research to refine exactly the setup of these agreements and what they mean. The end result is that these agreements provide the mechanism that makes the float extremely small.
What are They The Backstop Investors (BIs) are investors who are holding shares specifically to prevent them from being redeemed. Without the BIs the merger would potentially fail a vote or not have enough money in the trust account to meet requirements.
How Many Shares Do they Own? Per the agreement, BIs have 2,923,974 shares. Provided BIs are holding all of these shares, this makes the float effectively 341,131 shares. Per this agreement, they are required to hold a net-long positon for the Business Combination Meeting which should be announced any day now. The agreement establishes a mechanicsm that allows them to "theoretically sell" and then acquire shares that were previously redeemed from the trust. This means that should the stock increase, they could sell their position and then simply reacquire all the shares they needed to be net-long at the price of only $10.26 per share. However, as we'll explain, this isn't the case and as a result, any BI that sells is in serious trouble:

https://preview.redd.it/rl5t7eqjkbc81.png?width=1266&format=png&auto=webp&s=1ecb0d1797467ebe61e4f243c1e935cd6641698b
Excerpt from: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgadata/0001760683/000121390021058879/defr14a1121_eaststone.htm
Can They Sell? They cannot sell without consequences which remove their profit from having done so. Each of the BIs owns greater than 10% of the outstanding shares which makes them insiders:

https://preview.redd.it/ahbrts2lkbc81.png?width=1350&format=png&auto=webp&s=db64b7a246ce40b23349ecd997306bc1ac138c28
Excerpt from: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/insider.asp
Being an insider comes with certain restrictions, not the least of which is that you're prevented from swing trading. This rule is referred to as the "short-swing profit rule". The rule states that insiders cannot sell within six-months of having taken their position:

https://preview.redd.it/ia07d38mkbc81.png?width=1328&format=png&auto=webp&s=4c11d59b66818931848cb286c57ab329c8d5298f
Excerpt from: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/shortswingprofitrule.asp
In addition to this, insiders are also forbidden from short selling:

https://preview.redd.it/i5wh492okbc81.png?width=1512&format=png&auto=webp&s=769400848f7f0c30397d109c537a1858e205cf81
Excerpt from: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgadata/1164964/000101968715004168/globalfuture_8k-ex9904.htm
There is also market mechanics reason that is disincentivizing them from selling. Per their agreements, should they sell, they were given a mechanism to repurchase shares from the trust to make themselves whole. However, this portion of the agreement is nonsensical. As was confirmed by the Trust themselves (credit to u/Spacul8r on Twitter) all the shares in the trust are cancelled meaning they cannot be repurchased:

https://preview.redd.it/2zjpnnapkbc81.png?width=1036&format=png&auto=webp&s=4211818c675522318ed813f99dbd9e3bedd8480b
Excerpt from: https://twitter.com/Spacul8status/1479163464778231810?s=20 Special thanks to @Spacul8r for their incredible help with this play. A true asset to the retail trading community without a doubt.
This of course means that should any of the BIs sell, not only are they forfeiting the profit from having done so, but they'll also be forced to reacquire their shares at market before the Business Combination Meeting.
So of course, the BIs have held their shares through all the volatility ESSC has sustained over the course of the past month, including the first run to $14 and the second run to $26. Well, all except one.
The SeaOtter Sale On November 16th, 2021, just ahead of the extension meeting, SeaOtter (one of the BIs) filed that they'd acquired 974,658 shares (a part of the total 2.9M that BIs hold together) [LINK]. This position was presumably held through the extension meeting and was then partially sold on December 13th, 2021 [LINK]. They sold a total of 849,658 shares, which brought the float total to 1,190,789 shares.
As we've covered, the other BIs have held their positions through the first run to $14 and the second run to $26 (confirmed as deadline to file has passed). For this reason we're confident in our assessment that this sale was a mistake as it's left SeaOtter in a very dicey predicament where they're going to have to reacquire the 849,658 shares they sold at the market. It's also the reason we're confident that the other BIs will not sell, which locks in a float of at most 1,190,789 shares.
Possibly Re-Shrinking Float As we've detailed SeaOtter has to reacquire their shares before the Business Combination Meeting. Considering this, they are most likely to do this before the meeting is announced considering the announcement could cause volatility that would greatly increase the price they have to pay for the shares. With this in mind let's look at something curious that occured late last week.
Now, we know on November 16th, 2021 Sea Otter acquired their shares. Noticeably, just before the meeting on November 24th, 2021, we saw an increase in shortable shares roughly equal to Sea Otter's newly acquired position:

https://preview.redd.it/y41rq4hrkbc81.png?width=2318&format=png&auto=webp&s=f40db6ad355f4f347bba881474fd7a22d9e00418
Excerpt from: https://iborrowdesk.com/report/ESSC
Post meeting, this added liquidity was completely removed and only partially restored just after SeaOtters position was sold off in mid-December. Now, suddenly last week, the liquidity started to return with an influx of roughly 500K shares. Now, be warned, this is highly speculative and we have no way of knowing if this is correct until after OpEx because of the filing deadlines. However, we believe it's possible that this influx of liquidity is due to SeaOtter reacquiring the position they mistakenly sold off before the meeting.
If this is the case, this means the float is actively shrinking back to 341,131 shares. Making this setup one of the absolutely craziest setups we've ever seen.
Final Notes on Float We've fully outlined our float numbers. For the sake of the play we are currently using the 1,190,789 share float for our calculations, however, we'll also provide the "best case" float calcs alongside due to the credible possibility that the float will be that size by OpEx.
The Squeeze Now that we've got the setup defined as far as the float goes, let's work out how that applies to the OI and creates our squeeze setup. As we reviewed, this squeeze is powered by market maker hedging heading into options expiration similar to GME, AMC, SPRT & IRNT.
The Options Chain Below is the options chain for ESSC:

https://preview.redd.it/mj9fqvxskbc81.png?width=1822&format=png&auto=webp&s=543aefe4e8f988de1d005950e240700ffaa06cde
Excerpt from: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/ESSC/options/
There are currently 36,550 contracts in-the-money (ITM) which account for 3,655,000 shares. This puts the amount of the float claimed by ITM OI at a substantial 306%. In the event SeaOtter reacquires their position, the amount of float becomes an astounding 1,071%.
The next strike holds an additional 600,000 shares worth of OI bringing the percentage to 363% (1,268% if bought back) and if the whole chain goes ITM the OI would then account for 517% (1,806% if bought back).
OI Compared to Last Run & IRNT Knowing that the float for the mid-December run to $26 was the same as it is now, we can compare the OI % of float which triggered that run. We’ll also compare it to another known low-float gamma squeeze, IRNT.

https://preview.redd.it/2pl5d71ukbc81.png?width=770&format=png&auto=webp&s=65f58f1c054b6dffaaf4d6519d6f7a0a4019604a
When IRNT ran in September, the OI % of Float just before was 213%. In December, the ITM OI % of Float for ESSC that triggered the $26 run the week of OpEx was 214%. The number heading into OpEx this time around is 306%, making the current setup both more loaded than IRNT and ESSC #1 heading into this week.
Chart Comparison to Last Run Below is a comparison of ESSC #1 on the top with ESSC #2 on the bottom.

https://preview.redd.it/nvpnruavkbc81.png?width=2436&format=png&auto=webp&s=156a077d793d73e928a5b378f3d26c05e88d0005
There is a marked similarity between the two runs. Both runs started to gain momentum on the Monday two weeks out from OpEx. That run in both cases tapped upper resistance and pulled back for consolidation until Wednesday the week before OpEx at which time it returned to upper resistance, in the case of ESSC #1, breaking out the week of OpEx and running to $26.
What these charts illustrate is the process of delta hedging. There actually isn't a significant amount of evidence to show that hedging is done in real time, in fact, there is far more evidence to support that meaningful hedging is done in batches on week 2 and 4 of a monthly options cycle.
Short Interest While we don't believe it's meaningful for this specific play, there is a substantial amount of short interest currently in regards to % of float:

https://preview.redd.it/nc7i73fwkbc81.png?width=930&format=png&auto=webp&s=359598a05bce7cd8588813d47bc6c46e3058c98a
Shorts are currently just going out-of-the-money (OTM) on average, however, should price action continue shorts totaling 127% (443% if bought back) could find themselves underwater and it's very likely a portion of that can risk margin call.
Comparison to "Other Gamma Candidates" We've seen an increase in the amount of "gamma setups" since ESSC #1. To highlight how unusual and potentially crazy this setup is and how disengenuous some are being with their research, I'm going to do one more ITM OI % of Float comparison to two popular "gamma squeeze" tickers on Reddit at the moment. By searching Reddit I found these two:

https://preview.redd.it/qz8r1mnxkbc81.png?width=615&format=png&auto=webp&s=9ab84f5239d3b518c819630872358c1ef312d94a
Calculating NXTD First up is NXTD, I'm going to use the lowest listed float across these sites which is 4.5M.

https://preview.redd.it/cla9vdczkbc81.png?width=2470&format=png&auto=webp&s=fdacebba4a429f67392b20b180bc7f623ac0f175
And the options chain:

https://preview.redd.it/j9eywt70lbc81.png?width=1818&format=png&auto=webp&s=a17287f850fde1a10658fed92ddc3bd71f0b060d
4,569 ITM contracts accounts for 456,900 shares which is 10% ITM OI % of Float.
Calculating BBIG Doing the same here, we'll go with the lowest float calc which is 80M.

https://preview.redd.it/90062oe1lbc81.png?width=2454&format=png&auto=webp&s=432effe42f726205615b2499be35458839885b9d
Now let's look at the options chain:

https://preview.redd.it/g2qoqzb2lbc81.png?width=1840&format=png&auto=webp&s=cb9876dfc30514bd04112a01b206f552c7f911ec
79,457 contracts ITM accounts for 7,945,700 shares which is also 10% ITM OI % of Float.
Comparing vs ESSC Now let's put it all together:

https://preview.redd.it/spqdhma3lbc81.png?width=774&format=png&auto=webp&s=900dac21f0df878a543bca1bfeb83ce9700c4137
Bonus: SI Comparison Let's quickly compare the short interest on the same tickers:

https://preview.redd.it/llb1wyr4lbc81.png?width=571&format=png&auto=webp&s=ff000f483d65cc5a8270e56712df626aa9bb572e
Now, being completely fair, I'm going to recalc these using our lowest float numbers. This makes NXTD 17% SI % of Float and BBIG 38% SI % of Float.
Now let's put these together:

https://preview.redd.it/cbgwyjn6lbc81.png?width=783&format=png&auto=webp&s=dbddc72bdc597134f961f5a07f316201a02ea8e8
Wrapping Up It's safe to say that ESSC is miles ahead in potential and is potentially one of the craziest setups we've seen in recent history. Everything about the play points towards an imminent gamma squeeze that is likely capable of easily beating out the $26 high of the last run. The OI is larger, the ramp is better formed and the sentiment I think this time around will undoubtedly be stronger.
Closing Out & Signal Overview In closing, this expanded signal has been written to provide complete transparency for the play as often information can be sporadic and the full picture can get lost in translation across multiple platforms. Below you'll find our normal condensed signal.
Official Signal Overview ESSC has met our criteria to generate a signal for an imminent gamma squeeze. Our conditions require that a stock have the following:
  1. Significant OI ITM
  2. Organic bullish momentum pushing the underlying towards a breaking point
  3. Increasing sentiment
  4. Enough of an established "ramp" to propel the price movement upward without additional buying as OpEx draws closer.
The Setup
  1. This is a pre-deSPAC play. ESSC had redemptions triggered before actually merging, therefore there is no danger of PIPE related dilution at this juncture. We also believe there is no further danger of dilution from Backstop Investors either. However, everyone should be mindful that anything is possible in this world, we've done a considerable amount of research on this and are confident in our understanding of the situation, but certainly be careful and don't over leverage yourself.
  2. The redemptions initially left the float at 340K, however, with a confirmed sale by one of the SPAC's backstop investors, the float rests at ~1,190,789 shares.
  3. We believe that at some time in the near future, the same backstop investors who sold, will be required to obtain their position back at the market, essentially repurchasing 70% of the float, once again making it 340K.
  4. ITM OI is 302% of the float. The 17.5c makes it 363% of float and the entire chain accounts for 517% of the float.
  5. SI is now 127% of free float.
What we're calling
  1. This play is a gamma squeeze setup primarily. Due to the high amount of options sold which are currently ITM in comparison to the float, we expect the normal market mechanics of options Market Makers hedging (acquiring shares to offset risk) to force the price upward as options expiration draws closer.
  2. There is a short squeeze component to this now as well although we believe this typically are meaningless for this type of plays.
This play is very risky so only partake with money that you can afford to lose. We can be wrong, we have been wrong.
Good luck and godspeed gentlemen.
Disclaimer: I am not a financial advisor and this is not financial advice.
submitted by StonkGodCapital to SPACs [link] [comments]


http://pulse72.ru